🏠 Home 📚 Books 📜 Blog ▶ Videos ✍️ Bio ✉ Contact
The Crusades

The Fall of Jerusalem in 1099: the Glorious and Bloody End of the First Crusade

Three long years of marching, hunger, suffering and death culminated beneath the walls of the Holy City. What happened after the Crusader victory would stain the triumph forever.

10 Nov 2026 · 12 min
The army of the First Crusade beholds Jerusalem for the first time in June 1099, with the Crusader knights kneeling before the walls of the Holy City.

After three years of infernal marching, of crossing deserts and mountains, of dying of hunger and thirst, of impossible battles and miraculous relics, the surviving army of the First Crusade finally arrived, in June 1099, before the supreme prize: Jerusalem. The goal of the whole journey, the Holy City, the objective for which so many thousands of European Christians had died. The conquest that followed was the crusade's moment of greatest glory… and also of its greatest shame. Come with me, dear readers, to the end of the road.

The City of the Three Religions

Jerusalem was no ordinary city. It was, and still is, sacred to the three great religions: to the Jews, who claim it as their capital and home since time immemorial —some 3,000 years—, to the Christians as the place where Jesus Christ lived, preached and died —2,000+ years—, and to the Muslims, the last to arrive, 1,400 years ago, as the home of the Al-Aqsa mosque and because in the year 621 AD it received a highly improbable visit from the Prophet Muhammad who, in a single night, on the back of a resplendent mythological winged creature, the Buraq, is said to have flown from Mecca, in Saudi Arabia, to Jerusalem —some 1,300 km as the crow flies— and from there ascended into heaven.

Whether he and the Buraq were stoned out of their minds that night, the Quran doesn't say.

In the year 1099 AD, that is, of our era, the holy city was in the hands of a Muslim garrison —the Fatimids of Egypt had taken it not long before, snatching it from the Artuqid Turks, vassals of the Seljuks and Muslims too— well fortified behind imposing walls and ready to withstand a long siege.

The Crusader army that reached its gates was by now only a fraction of the one that had left Europe: of the tens of thousands at the start, eighty thousand according to some chronicles, perhaps some twelve thousand men were left fit to fight, with barely over a thousand knights. The rest had died on the road, had deserted, or had stayed behind to defend the newly founded Latin kingdoms of the East, the County of Edessa and the Principality of Antioch. But those left to fight that last battle were the toughest Crusaders, the most fanatical and the most determined to take home the big prize: Jerusalem. They had come too far, lost and suffered too much, to fail at the very gates of their goal.

Thirst, Faith and Siege Towers

The siege was brutal, but this time not because of its length, rather because of the general conditions on the battlefield. The Christian besiegers were stranded outside the walls, in the height of summer in an arid land where the defenders had poisoned or blocked the surrounding wells. The Crusaders suffered an atrocious thirst beneath the relentless, scorching sun of Judea. Anyone who has visited that part of the world in summer knows what I'm talking about. On top of that, to complicate matters even further, they lacked the timber to build the siege engines needed to get over the walls.

The immense faith in God of those ancestors of ours, once again, played its part. Spurred on by the sermons of the clergy present, the Crusaders organised a solemn, barefoot procession around the walls of Jerusalem to ask God for a new miracle. All this beneath the astonished and amused gaze of the Muslim defenders perched on top of the walls who, dying of laughter, must have thought those Catholics were drunk or utterly stoned to walk like that, in their robes and barefoot, over that dusty, stabbing, painful stony ground. They didn't know the Crusaders were imitating what the Bible says the Jewish leader Joshua did beneath the impregnable walls of Jericho.

Barefoot Crusaders in procession around the walls of Jerusalem on 8 July 1099, mocked by the Fatimid defenders.
The Crusaders walk barefoot around the walls of Jerusalem, imitating Joshua at Jericho, while the Fatimid defenders watch from above.

And the miracle was not long in coming. Almost a month earlier, around 17 June, a flotilla of some six Genoese ships had reached the port of Jaffa, about fifty-five kilometres west of the city, under the Italian leader William Embriaco, nicknamed “Caput Mallei, Hammerhead”. The Genoese, famous throughout Italy for their proverbial tight-fistedness and for never handing over anything of theirs for free, had come to enlist and fight in the Crusade on behalf of their city, but, good Ligurians that they were, they didn't want to abandon their valuable ships moored in the harbour for fear of losing them or having them stolen. And, incredible as it sounds, on the orders of Hammerhead, who must have told his men in Genoese dialect something like: «Belín figé ragazzi, le navi costan palanche, adesso le smontiamo tutte e ce le portiamo via per il deserto – Fuck me, lads, ships cost a fortune, we'll take them all apart now and carry them off on our backs across the desert», they dismantled them completely down to the last nail, loaded the heavy timbers, ropes and sails onto their shoulders, and carried them from the port of Jaffa all the way to Jerusalem, thereby saving the siege, so desperately in need of precisely those timbers and nails.

William Embriaco, “Hammerhead”, and the Genoese sailors carry on their shoulders the timbers of their dismantled ships from Jaffa to Jerusalem in June 1099.
William Embriaco, “Hammerhead”, carries the dismantled ships of Genoa on his shoulders across the desert.

With the timber at last secured, the Crusaders, under the direction of Embriaco's Genoese carpenters and of their “chief engineer” Gaston of Bearn, built two great siege towers mounted on wheels (that of Godfrey of Bouillon and that of Raymond of Saint-Gilles), as well as other lesser engines, true multi-storey mobile castles, so as to reach the top of the walls and break in by force. The final assault was ready.

The Assault of 15 July

On 13 July 1099 the Crusaders launched the general assault, and on Friday the 15th the decisive one. They pushed the enormous siege towers up against the walls amid a rain of arrows, fire and projectiles. After hours of ferocious fighting, a group of knights (the chronicles name as the first Letold of Tournai and his brother Engelbert, followed closely by the Duke of Lorraine, Godfrey of Bouillon) managed to lay a bridge from the top of a tower to the wall and set foot on it. The Muslim defence collapsed. The Crusaders poured into the Holy City screaming like men possessed.

Godfrey of Bouillon leads the assault from the top of the siege tower against the walls of Jerusalem on 15 July 1099.
15 July 1099: Godfrey of Bouillon and his knights cross the tower's bridge onto the wall of Jerusalem.

Three years of suffering and deprivation, of dead men, of hunger and desperate faith, at last led to that long-desired instant. Jerusalem, the dreamed-of objective, fell at last, for the first time, into the hands of European Catholic Christians. It was, without a doubt, the moment of greatest glory and emotion of the whole First Crusade. Those men wept with joy and exhaustion. They had achieved the impossible, at a very high price.

The Cruel Massacre of Civilians that Blackened the Triumph

But what came next is one of the darkest pages of medieval history, and honesty demands that it be told without embellishment. After taking the city, the Crusaders, maddened by years of suffering and fanaticism, perpetrated a horrifying massacre among the population of Jerusalem. They made no distinction between combatants and civilians. The Muslims and Jews of the city were slaughtered without mercy, almost all of them, over two days. Only the few who surrendered to Raymond of Saint-Gilles in the Tower of David were spared and escorted to Ascalon.

The chronicles of the time, Christian and Muslim alike, describe atrocious scenes of streets covered in corpses, great pools of human blood, whole families hanged, throat-cut or burned alive and women raped in a colossal, unjustifiable butchery which the Christian chroniclers celebrated as God's just judgement and which Muslims and Jews never forgot, atrocious even by the brutal standards of medieval warfare. It was one of those massacres that stain a victory forever, a reminder that fanaticism, once unleashed, knows no brake. The glory of the triumph was tinged with innocent blood.

The chaplain and historian Fulcher of Chartres, who gathered the account of those who were there, wrote the following:

«The slaughter carried out by our men, inside that Islamic temple, was so great that our men walked with the blood of the Muslims reaching up to their ankles... And in truth, had you been there you would have seen our feet coloured up to the ankles with the blood of the massacre. But what more can I tell you? None was left alive; there was no mercy for women or for children».

His colleague, the likewise chaplain and historian Raymond of Aguilers, who was indeed there, tells it like this, in a free version:

«On that day, 15 July in the year of Our Lord 1099, in Jerusalem, marvellous spectacles came to gladden our eyes… […] Such an incredible quantity of blood was spilled, in the mosque built on Solomon's temple alone, that the corpses of those Islamic infidels floated in it and in many places the blood reached up to our knees…»

The next day, the 16th, in a gloomy and silent Jerusalem, turned into a true ghost town, the Crusader leaders, to prevent dangerous epidemics breaking out and because of the tremendous stench that was already beginning to poison the air, enveloping everything, issued an executive order that is vividly described to us by the anonymous author of the “Gesta Francorum”. I leave you his words, in a free version:

«Our leaders ordered that all the dead Saracens be sent outside the city because of the stench, since the whole city was full of bodies; so the few living Saracens who still remained were made slaves and forced to drag the dead to the exit gates of the walls, and they laid them out on pyres like houses. No one ever could see or hear of a massacre of pagans like that one, since the funeral pyres rose like pyramids, and no one knows their exact number, save God himself».

Enslaved Muslim survivors drag the dead to the funeral pyres that rise like pyramids outside the walls of Jerusalem, on 16 July 1099.
The funeral pyres of Jerusalem, which according to the “Gesta Francorum” rose “like pyramids”.

The Kingdom Born of Blood

After the conquest, the Crusaders founded the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the third Christian state in the Holy Land after Edessa and Antioch, a state that would endure, with ups and downs, for almost two centuries. Godfrey of Bouillon was elected first ruler, although he refused the crown and the title of king (he would not, he said, wear a crown of gold where Christ had worn one of thorns), and so he adopted the less lofty title of Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri, Protector and Defender of the Holy Sepulchre, rather than king.

Godfrey of Bouillon refuses the golden crown of King of Jerusalem in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, in July 1099.
Godfrey of Bouillon refuses the golden crown where Christ had worn one of thorns.

The First Crusade had achieved its impossible objective. Against all odds, a ragged and decimated army had marched thousands of kilometres (almost five thousand in three long years of war) and conquered Jerusalem. It was the only one of the great crusades to fulfil its military goal one hundred per cent, and that is why it has remained the most legendary crusade of the other seven that followed it in the almost two hundred years of European Christian-Catholic presence in the Holy Land. But its ending holds all the contradiction of that age: the most sublime faith and the most extreme cruelty, living together in the same men, on the same day, in the same holy city.

If you want to live the First Crusade in full, from the preaching to this conquest, with all its characters and battles, you have it in my saga History of the Eight Crusades: starting with The Crusade of Peter the Hermit, continuing with The Blood of Jerusalem · Part 1 and Part 2 —where the Crusaders take the city— and on to The Dawn of the Templars. Real history told like nobody ever told it to you before, with all its glory and all its shadows.

And if you want to know what became of that kingdom, read about Baldwin IV, the leper king who defeated Saladin, about Saladin and about Hugues de Payens, founder of the Templar Order.

Per Aspera, Ad Astra.

✠ David S. Matrecano

Ibiza, 10 November 2026

Frequently asked questions

When and how did the fall of Jerusalem in 1099 happen, also known as the conquest of Jerusalem by the First Crusade?

The First Crusade reached Jerusalem on 7 June 1099 and took the city on Friday 15 July, after a siege of just over five weeks. It was defended by a Fatimid Egyptian garrison under the governor Iftikhar al-Dawla, who had expelled the local Christians, poisoned the surrounding wells and reinforced the walls. The Crusaders, with no water and no timber, solved the problem with the help of the Genoese sailors and built siege towers. According to the chronicles, the general attack began on 13 July and the outer wall fell on the 14th. On the 15th, from the top of Godfrey of Bouillon's tower, a bridge was laid across to the wall: the first to set foot on it were Letold of Tournai and his brother Engelbert, followed by Godfrey himself. The defence collapsed and the Crusaders burst into the Holy City.

Who was defending Jerusalem in 1099 and how many men did the Crusaders have?

Jerusalem was in the hands of the Fatimids of Egypt, who had taken it in August 1098 from the Artuqid Turkmen, vassals of the Seljuks. Its governor, Iftikhar al-Dawla, had a garrison of about a thousand Egyptian soldiers, reinforced by the city's own militias. The Crusaders, led chiefly by Godfrey of Bouillon and Raymond of Saint-Gilles, were far fewer than when they had left Europe: modern estimates speak of some 1,200 or 1,300 knights and about 12,000 combatants in total, joined by unarmed pilgrims. The figures in the chronicles vary widely and are unreliable. The Egyptian relief army, commanded by the vizier al-Afdal, arrived late: Jerusalem had already fallen, and it was defeated by the Crusaders at Ascalon on 12 August 1099.

What role did the Genoese of William Embriaco, “Hammerhead”, play in the capture of Jerusalem?

In mid-June 1099 a Genoese flotilla dropped anchor at Jaffa. With the Egyptian fleet threatening the coast, their captains could not leave the ships in port, so they dismantled them and carried the timbers, nails and ropes to Jerusalem on their shoulders and on the backs of animals. Their leader, William Embriaco, nicknamed “Caput Mallei”, Hammerhead, arrived with his carpenters at a camp that had no timber to build siege engines. The Genoese chronicler Caffaro credits him with a decisive role in building the towers, although the sources do not agree on how to share out the credit: other Crusaders also found timber in the forests of Samaria, and Gaston of Bearn is named as an engineer. Without the towers, the Crusaders could not have overcome the walls of Jerusalem.

Was there a massacre of Muslims and Jews after the capture of Jerusalem in 1099, how many victims are estimated and what do the chronicles say?

Yes. On 15 and 16 July 1099 the Crusaders killed a large part of the population of Jerusalem, making no distinction between combatants and civilians. The Christian and Muslim sources agree on the essentials: streets full of corpses and thousands of refugees butchered on the Temple Mount and in the Al-Aqsa mosque, even though Tancred of Hauteville had given them his banner as protection. The Muslim chronicles, such as those of Ibn al-Qalanisi and Ibn al-Athir, add that the Jews of the city were burned in their synagogue. Not the whole population died: the garrison of the Tower of David surrendered to Raymond of Saint-Gilles and was escorted to Ascalon, and some prisoners were ransomed by their communities. The figures are impossible to fix: Ibn al-Athir speaks of 70,000 dead in Al-Aqsa, which historians consider exaggerated, and modern estimates range from several thousand to tens of thousands.

What do Fulcher of Chartres, Raymond of Aguilers and the “Gesta Francorum” say about the massacre of Jerusalem, and how reliable are they?

Raymond of Aguilers, chaplain to Raymond of Saint-Gilles, was at the siege and describes severed heads, hands and feet piled in the streets and blood “up to the knees” in the precinct of Solomon's Temple. Fulcher of Chartres, chaplain to Baldwin of Boulogne, wrote his chronicle a few years later and left the famous line: “had you been there, you would have seen our feet coloured up to the ankles with the blood of the dead”. The “Gesta Francorum”, by an anonymous author linked to the army of Bohemond of Taranto, tells how the corpses were taken out of the city and heaped on pyres “like pyramids”. All three are Latin Christians who wrote to celebrate a victory they saw as God's judgement, and they exaggerate with rhetoric. But the massacre does not depend on them alone: it is also confirmed by the Muslim and Jewish sources.

Why did Godfrey of Bouillon refuse the title of King of Jerusalem and what did “Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri” mean?

After the conquest, the Crusader leaders had to choose who would govern the city. According to several chronicles, the crown was first offered to Raymond of Saint-Gilles, who refused it, and on 22 July 1099 Godfrey of Bouillon, Duke of Lower Lorraine, was elected. Godfrey did not want the title of king: according to tradition, he said he would not wear a crown of gold in the city where Christ had worn one of thorns. He adopted the title “Advocatus Sancti Sepulchri”, “Defender of the Holy Sepulchre”, since “advocatus” designated the lay protector of a church. Godfrey died on 18 July 1100, and his brother Baldwin, who had no such scruples, was crowned first King of Jerusalem in Bethlehem on Christmas Day of that same year.

What happened after the fall of Jerusalem in 1099 and how long did the Kingdom of Jerusalem founded by Godfrey of Bouillon last?

On 12 August 1099 the Crusaders defeated the Egyptian relief army at Ascalon, thus removing the immediate danger. Afterwards, most of the pilgrims returned to Europe and Godfrey stayed with a few hundred knights and a few thousand foot soldiers to defend what had been conquered. From those few men was born the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the third Crusader state after Edessa and Antioch, which lasted almost two centuries, from 1099 to 1291. Saladin reconquered Jerusalem on 2 October 1187 and the capital moved to Acre. Emperor Frederick II recovered the Holy City by treaty in 1229, but it was lost for good in 1244. The fall of Acre, in 1291, ended the Crusader presence in the Holy Land.

Sources and references

There is NO fiction in this article

The facts —the siege of Jerusalem in 1099, the thirst and the lack of timber, the barefoot procession around the walls, the arrival of the Genoese, who dismantled their ships to bring the timber to Jerusalem, the siege towers, the assault of 13 to 15 July with Letold of Tournai and Godfrey of Bouillon among the first to climb the wall, the massacre of the Muslim and Jewish population after the capture and the founding of the Kingdom of Jerusalem— are documented in the Christian and Muslim chronicles of the time. The dialogues in Genoese, the jokes and the assumptions about what the defenders were thinking are literary licences of the narrator, part of the personal voice of the author, David S. Matrecano.

✠ Recommended reading ✠

The Blood of Jerusalem · Part 2

View on Amazon
David S. Matrecano
✠ David S. Matrecano ✠
Ibiza, March 2026

Italian writer based in Ibiza. Author of the sagas The Eight Crusades and Herodotus · Histories Reloaded.

DM
Per Aspera, Ad Astra.
Share
← Back to Blog
✦ ✦ ✦

Did you enjoy this article?

Thanks for your vote!
✠

Want to tell me something? Your message comes straight to me.

Your data is only used to reply and, if you opt in, to send you news. Privacy policy.